GCSE results: vocational subjects are on the up

Tina Isaacs

This article was originally published on The Conversation.

Despite a number of dire warnings, overall GCSE results have not been very volatile. Across the country, the number of students getting A* to C grades has increased slightly, by 0.7% points. On the basis of past performance, students who would have received an A or a C grade in 2013, should have received that A or C this year too. But there are some marked subject differences, as well as developments in the number of teenagers taking vocational and computing subjects.

We have already had a relatively boring set of A level results this summer. On the whole, A Level grades were similar to last year’s, with some minor fluctuations, most notably in an increase of students who got A* grade.

Please don’t misunderstand me when I say boring: when it comes to exams, this is a good thing. It reassures us that most students got the grades they deserved. Of course, there will always be exceptions – measurement error in examinations, no matter what the politicians tell us, is inevitable and will always be with us.

For the GCSEs, on a subject-by-subject basis there were notable differences. The A* to C pass rate for English was down 1.9% points, while in mathematics it was up 4.8% points and 6% points in science.

CC BY-ND

Overall, the number of exam entries was down by over 200,000, from 5.4m in 2013 to 5.2m in 2014, largely due to a 39% drop in the number of entries for Year 10 students. But even these changes are less dramatic than it might seem.

Rise in vocational subjects

Two points I have noted that probably will not get much attention were the increase in the take-up of applied (vocational) GCSEs as well as a dramatic increase in computing and ICT GCSEs, admittedly from a low base.

CC BY-ND

Business, engineering, health and social care, media studies, hospitality and catering, and leisure and tourism are all on the increase. Some subjects, such as engineering and social care have seen the number of A* to C students increase, while others including leisure and tourism and business studies, have seen a decrease.

As for computing – the number of entries jumped almost fourfold to 16,773 this year. However, there was a slight dip in the numbers of students getting A* to C – down from 68.4% in 2013 to 65.5% this year. Computing now counts as a science, and therefore as one of the subjects in the English Baccalureate, a performance measure of five core subjects now being used in school rankings. The number of ICT entries was also up 40% to 96,811.

Many vocational qualifications are no longer counted as equivalent to GCSEs in this year’s school performance tables, following on from recommendations in Alison Wolf’s 2011 review of vocational qualifications. Those qualifications that are able to be counted now only attract the points-equivalent of one GCSE, when in the past some counted for more. This has discouraged schools from entering students for those qualifications.

But it seems this year’s results show signs that some schools are shifting some of their students into applied GCSEs. This could possibly be in anticipation of counting at least some of the qualification results toward the “best eight” qualifications that will now be the basis of new performance tables, due to be introduced in 2016.

Impact of decline in early entry

Students in England will have taken all of their examinations at the end of their two-year GCSE course because of the government’s insistence on linear qualifications.

For English GCSEs, speaking and listening is now graded separately and does not count in the overall results. Many students in the past have done better in this teacher-marked element than in reading and writing – just think about how verbally articulate most teenagers are and you can see why. English is now 60% externally assessed through examination papers whereas last year it was 40%.

And changes to the way performance tables are structured now mean that only a student’s first attempt at an examination is counted toward the school’s results. Many schools have ceased to enter 15-year-old Year 10 students early for the examinations, resulting in 300,000 fewer early entries this year.

Those schools that made little use of early entry and resits will on the whole have stable or perhaps even better results than last year. For those that made wide use of these practices, the picture could be mixed. Multiple re-sits can just help those students on the border between grade C and grade D to get the higher grade – boosting school results. But taking a qualification at age 16 rather than 15 could mean that students do better because they’ve studied longer and are more mature, pushing results up.

Read the original article.

Tagged with: , ,
Posted in Teaching, learning, curriculum & assessment
4 comments on “GCSE results: vocational subjects are on the up
  1. Ian Lynch says:

    Given that a lot of vocational qualifications were chopped and those that were not have had to be redeveloped it is not at all surprising that GCSEs in the more applied and vocational areas are up. It would be interesting to know if there is a change in overall ICT qualification take up. What was the combined GCSE and alternatives take up last year and this year? In other words are more or fewer pupils doing ICT qualifications? Computing at 16,000 is tiny compared to the cohort size but given the changes to KS3 one would expect a steady rise at the expense of ICT in the future but will it take over from ICT? Approximately 100,000 in ICT but how many in vocational ICT courses? What about a balance of IT and CS in the NAACE/TLM Certificate in Open Systems Computing coming in 2016?

    What about the new Tech Awards? These are likely to figure in the 3 subject spaces in attainment and progress 8 from next year onwards. Given that a significant number of the brightest kids get the top grade possible and around the top quarter A and A*s why is stopping early entry of these seen as a good thing? Surely if they can achieve the top grade a year or two early they should be moving on to higher level work? Seems like under-expectations on the brightest kids to me.

  2. dodiscimus says:

    I suspect that, as well as the changes to the relevance of vocational qualifications to school performance tables, the introduction of external assessment via on-screen exams for BTEC Level 2, will have made a difference to some decisions schools have made – the lack of any external assessment has been quite an appealing feature of BTEC in the past.

  3. Ian Lynch says:

    BTEC is not the only vocational alternative. External assessment is now mandatory, but it does not have to be on-screen and it does not have to apply to coursework. So there is considerable scope to design qualifications that keep the advantages of motivation inherent to coursework, get rid of 90% of the bureaucratic overhead and have on demand assessment to suit the school rather than some overly complex administrative system. That gives teachers more time to teach and reduces the costs too.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

@IOE_London

Enter your email address

Want to keep up with IOE research?