Why job insecurity is bad for our health

Francis Green

We live in uncertain times. Eight years on from the Great Recession of 2008, and still one in ten workers across Europe is unemployed – that’s 21 million people. Global growth is faltering and in Europe the “Brexit” decision threatens a prolonged period of adjustment at minimum. It is likely that there will be low growth in Britain for a while, if not a renewed recession, and repercussions elsewhere. What does this uncertainty mean for our well-being and for the demands placed on health systems? Can we do anything to alleviate the potential health fall-out?

For some time now we have known that health can be impaired through unemployment. It can lead to a loss of identity, because many see their job as part of what they are – even if they may sometimes curse it on a Monday morning when facing a long week’s hard work ahead. And of course unemployment also means a loss of livelihood.

But the problem of uncertainty goes well beyond just those people unlucky enough to lose their job. Many more live their lives in fear of losing their job. Evidence comes, for example, from the European Survey of Working Conditions. Across Europe last year, 16 percent of those in employment reported that they might lose their job in the ensuing six months – that’s 33 million workers. The proportion who feel like this goes up when unemployment rises, and what people expect generally captures the real risks fairly well. The fear acts as a stressor on the human body, with consequent physical and mental effects. Just as with unemployment itself, the fear of job loss goes beyond the very real financial risks for hard-up families.

So what do we know about the effects of this job insecurity on our health in practice? Recent studies across Europe have shown that people in insecure jobs are indeed less healthy. The most convincing ones look at situations where insecurity has increased and workers can’t avoid it. One such study covering many countries found that job insecurity has substantial effects on headaches, eyestrains, and skin problems and on self-reported ill-health. Another study covering Australia, Canada, Switzerland and the United Kingdom found that, when people moved from a secure to an insecure job, they suffered a substantial increase in mental distress. These findings reveal only part of the problem, because they do not begin to touch on the knock-on effects on family members.

I do not believe that we should have to live with macroeconomic uncertainty. Decisions that led to the Great Recession and, later to the British public voting for Brexit, were misguided and avoidable. But, given the situation we are in now, what can be done to minimise the health fall-out from job insecurity?

One thing we do know is that the prospect of regaining employment is very important for health. Policy-makers can alleviate demands on the health system through strategies to encourage a decent flow of job opportunities – making sure labour markets are open, enabling retraining opportunities and stimulating macroeconomic demand. But the evidence also shows that employers can help. Ensuring that their employees have systems of social support, and can participate to a degree in decision-making, are important ways in which they can counter the ill effects of insecurity.

Felstead, A., Gallie, D. and Green, F. (eds) Unequal Britain At Work. Oxford University Press.

Tagged with: , , , , ,
Posted in Social sciences and social policy
One comment on “Why job insecurity is bad for our health
  1. Mark Newman says:

    It is useful to have the longstanding and worsening issue of employment insecurity highlighted in academic research. However the academic community itself needs to take a lead on this issue by putting its own house in order. Higher Education is one of the most egregious abusers of so called flexible employment practices . A report by the Higher Education Union UCU found that an average of 53% of academics across UK higher education are employed on insecure contracts with the highest levels of casualisation being seen at the research-intensive Russell Group of universities (59% average).
    https://www.ucu.org.uk/article/8533/Russell-Group-universities-worst-offenders-when-it-comes-to-insecure-contracts

    The situation seems set to worsen given the kinds of marketised version of Higher Education proposed by the Higher Education reform act currently making its way through parliament https://heconvention2.files.wordpress.com/2016/06/awp1.pdf

    Useful as research is surely its time that we members of the academic community stands up for ourselves and those we serve by demanding and end to these poor employment practice that encourage division and inequality between staff in Higher Education

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

@IOE_London

Enter your email address

Want to keep up with IOE research?